Investigation and Analysis of ICT development index (IDI) for measuring ICT resources in Georgia

Автор(и)

  • Giorgi Popkhadze Georgian Technical University (GTU), Faculty of Transportation and Mechanical Engineering, Tbilisi, Грузія
  • Predrag Dašić Academy of Professional Studies Šumadija – Department in Trstenik, Trstenik, Сербія
  • Raul Turmanidze Georgian Technical University (GTU), Faculty of Transportation and Mechanical Engineering, Tbilisi, Грузія

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2409-7160.2021.XXII.242644

Ключові слова:

Information technology (IT), Information and communication technologies (ICT), ICT development index (IDI), Indus-try 4.0

Анотація

Abstract. Information and communication technologies (ICT) are a set of equipment (devices, systems, etc.) and techniques with associated software (software systems and software tools) that have been developed and used for more efficient communication, creation, distribution, storage and management of information. The IDI (ICT Development Index) index is most often used to measure ICT resources, which is defined as a composite index that combines 11 indicators (classified into 3 sub-indices: Access, Use and Skills). Data on values of IDI index has been retrieved from Measuring the Information Society Report (MISR), which since 2008 has been publishing by International Telecommunications Union (ITU). The IDI index for 2017 was determined for 176 countries of the world, with the first on the ranking list was Iceland with IDI2017=8.98 and the last Eritrea with IDI2017=0.96. The mean value of IDI index for 2017 was Avg=5.11, standard deviation was StD=2.22 and coefficient of variation was CoV=43.52. In this paper is given of analysis of IDI (ICT development index) for measuring ICT resources in Georgia. The data were approximated using a 3rd degree polynomial regression model (PRM3) with a correlation coefficient R=0.9964, determination coefficient R2=0.9928 and adjustment coefficient of determination is AdjR2=0.9885.

Посилання

  1. Afshar Ali, M.; Alam, K. & Taylor, B.: Incorporating affordability, efficiency, and quality in the ICT development index: Implications for index building and ICT policymaking. The Information Society, Vol. 36, Issue 2 (2020), pp. 71–96. ISSN 0197-2243. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2019.1702601.
  2. Ayanso, A.; Cho, D.I. & Lertwachara, K.: ICT development index and the digital divide. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Resources Management (Conf-IRM-2011); Seoul, South Korea; 12-14 June 2011. Red Hook (New York – USA): Curran Associates Inc., 2013, pp. 943– 952. ISBN 978-1-62276-624-6.
  3. Bahnamiri, M.V.; Khademabbasi, S. & Valinataj, M.: A multi-criteria decision method using fuzzy TOPSIS technique for ranking countries based on ICT development index (IDI). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, Vol. 13, Issue 6 (2015),
  4. pp. 3851–3869. ISSN 0972-7302.
  5. Chen, S.-P.: Fundamentals of information and communication technologies. Newcastle upon Tyne (United Kingdom): Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020. – 238 pp. ISBN 978-1-5275-5585-3.
  6. Dašić, P.: Scientific and technological trends: Selected scientific-professional papers (in Serbian). Vrnjačka Banja: SaTCIP Publesher Ltd., 2020. – 305 str. ISBN 978-86-6075-072-5.
  7. Dašić, P.: Statistical analysis and modeling of global competitiveness index (GCI) of Serbia. Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry (JRaDMI), Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2018). ISSN 1821-3103.
  8. Dašić, P.; Dašić, J.; Antanasković, D. & Pavićević, N.: Statistical analysis and modeling of global innovation index (GII) of Serbia. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (LNNS), Vol. 128 (2020), pp. 515–521. ISSN 2367-3370 and ISBN 978-3-030-46816-3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_59.
  9. Dobrota, M.; Jeremic, V. & Markovic, A.: A new perspective on the ICT development index. Information Development, Vol. 28, Issue 4 (November 2012), pp. 271–280. ISSN 0266-6669. doi: 10.1177/0266666912446497.
  10. Dutton, W.H. & Peltu, M. (editors): Information and communication technologies: Visions and realities. New York (New York – USA): Oxford University Press Inc. (OUP), 1996. – 484 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-877496-9.
  11. Farhadi, M.; Ismail, R. & Fooladi, M.: Information and communication technology use and economic growth. PLoS One, Vol. 7, Issue 11 (November 2012), Article no. e48903: pp. 1-7. eISSN 1932-6203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048903.
  12. Feridun, M. & Karagiannis, S.: Growth effects of information and communication technologies: Empirical evidence from the enlarged EU. Transformations in Business and Economics, Vol. 8, Issue 2 (September 2009), pp. 86–99. ISSN 1648-4460.
  13. James, J.: The ICT Development Index and the digital divide: How are they related? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 79, Issue 3 (March 2012), pp. 587–594. ISSN 00401625. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.010.
  14. Karabegović, I.; Kovačević, A.; Banjanović-Mehmedović, L. & Dašić, P. (editors): Handbook of research on integrating Industry 4.0 in business and manufacturing. Hershey (Pennsylvania - USA): IGI Global, 2020. – 400 pp. ISBN 978-1-7998-2725-2. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2725-2.
  15. Khakimov, A.; Karlinskiy, V. & Rakhmatullin, R.: Information and communication technologies in SMEs: Competitiveness analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Vol. 21, Special Issue 2 (2018), pp. 1–9. ISSN 1098-8394.
  16. Latif, Z.; Xin, W.; Khan, D.; Iqbal, K.; Pathan, Z.H.; Salam, S. & Jan, N.: ICT and sustainable development in South Asian countries. Human Systems Management (HSM), Vol. 36, Issue 4 (November 2017), pp. 353–362. ISSN 0167-2533. doi: 10.3233/HSM-17166.
  17. Mansell, R.; Avgerou, C.; Quah, D. & Silverstone, R. (editors): The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies. New York (New York – USA): Oxford University Press Inc. (OUP), 2009. – 752 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-954879-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548798. 001.0001.
  18. Measuring the Information Society Report 2009: The ICT development index. Geneva (Switzerland): International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2009. – 96 pp. ISBN 978-92-61-12831-9.
  19. Measuring the Information Society Report 2015. Geneva (Switzerland): International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2015. – 234 pp. ISBN 978-92-61-15791-3.
  20. Measuring the Information Society Report 2017. Vol. 1. Geneva (Switzerland): International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2017. – 154 pp. ISBN 978-92-61-24511-5.
  21. Measuring the Information Society Report 2018. Vol. 1. Geneva (Switzerland): International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2018. – 189 pp. ISBN 978-92-61-27221-0.
  22. Moroz, M.: The level of development of the digital economy in Poland and selected European countries: A comparative analysis. Foundations of Management, Vol. 9 (2017), pp. 175–190. ISSN 2300-5661. doi: 10.1515/fman-2017-0014.
  23. Nath, H.K. & Liu, L.: Information and communications technology (ICT) and services trade. Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 41 (December 2017), pp. 81–87. ISSN 0167-6245. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.06.003.
  24. Turmanidze, R.; Dašić, P. & Popkhadze, G.: Analysis of innovation activities in Georgia as a major factor in application of the Industry 4.0 concept. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (LNNS), Vol. 233 (2021), pp. 270–277. ISSN 2367-3370 and ISBN 978-3-030-75274-3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-75275-0_31.
  25. Turmanidze, R.; Dašić, P. & Popkhadze, G.: Analysis of some socio-economic-technical indicators of Georgia. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference "Economics and Management-Based on New Technologies" (EMoNT-2019); Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia; 23-26 June 2019. Vrnjačka Banja: SaTCIP Publisher Ltd., 2019, pp. 1–12. ISBN 978-86-6075-067-1.
  26. Turmanidze, R.; Dašić, P. & Popkhadze, G.: Digital infrastructure in Georgia as a condition for successful application Industry 4.0. International Scientific Journal "Industry 4.0", Vol. 5, Issue 1 (2020), pp. 3–6. ISSN 2534-8582.
  27. Turmanidze, R.; Dašić, P. & Popkhadze, G.: Industry 4.0: New manufacturing philosophy. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference "Research and Development in Mechanical Industry" (RaDMI-2018); Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia; 13-16 September 2018. Vrnjačka Banja (Serbia): SaTCIP Publisher Ltd., 2018, pp. 63–74. ISBN 978-86-6075-066-4.
  28. Turmanidze, R.; Dašić, P. & Popkhadze, G.: Statistical analysis of e-government development index (EGDI) of Georgia. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (LNNS), Vol. 128 (2020), pp. 930–938. ISSN 2367-3370 and ISBN 978-3-030-46816-3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_105.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2021-09-09

Як цитувати

Popkhadze, G. ., Dašić, P., & Turmanidze, R. (2021). Investigation and Analysis of ICT development index (IDI) for measuring ICT resources in Georgia. Матеріали науково-технічної конференції "Прогресивна техніка, технологія та інженерна освіта", (XXII). https://doi.org/10.20535/2409-7160.2021.XXII.242644

Номер

№ XXII (2021): Прогресивна техніка, технологія та інженерна освіта

Розділ

ПРОБЛЕМИ ВИЩОЇ ІНЖЕНЕРНОЇ ОСВІТИ В УКРАЇНІ

Ліцензія

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з такими умовами:

  1. Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії CC BY 4.0, яка дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.

  2. Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.

  3. Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи.